All dosage information on this page is drawn from preclinical rodent studies and one Phase 2 clinical trial record. These are research contexts, not recommendations for human use. Ipamorelin has no approved human dosage protocol. All doses are attributed to their cited study and species.
Ipamorelin Dosage in Preclinical Studies
Ipamorelin research spans four dose contexts, each corresponding to a different research area. The ranges are not interchangeable — dose, route, species, and study duration interact to produce distinct outcome profiles.
GH-release selectivity studies (Raun et al. 1998): Doses of 1–100 µg/kg administered intravenously to rats for acute GH-pulse measurements.[1] The 100 µg/kg IV dose is the highest in the selectivity series; at this dose, which exceeds the GH-releasing ED₅₀ by more than 200-fold, ACTH and cortisol remained unchanged.[1]
Bone biology studies: Johansen et al. 1999 used three dose levels subcutaneously for assessment of longitudinal bone growth — the study reports incremental periosteal growth rates from 42 µm/day to 52 µm/day across doses.[3] Andersen et al. 2001 used 100 µg/kg SC three times daily for three months in 8-month-old adult female rats — the longest and highest-frequency preclinical dosing protocol in the published record — producing four-fold restoration of periosteal bone formation rate in glucocorticoid-exposed animals.[4]
GI motility studies (Venkova et al. 2009): Doses ranging 0.01–1 mg/kg IV bolus in male rats for postoperative ileus; single-dose at 1 mg/kg produced accelerated bowel movement; repetitive dosing at 0.1 or 1 mg/kg produced cumulative fecal pellet output and food intake increases.[5] Doses are expressed in mg/kg here (0.01–1 mg/kg = 10–1000 µg/kg), placing GI motility doses above the acute GH-release range.
Phase 2 clinical trial (NCT00672074): IV infusion in post-surgical human patients.[15] Specific dose levels are not published in summary; the trial documents use in a clinical-investigational setting. No results were published as an NDA submission.
| Study | Dose range | Route | Species | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raun et al. 1998 (selectivity) | 1–100 µg/kg | IV | Rat | Acute |
| Johansen et al. 1999 (bone elongation) | 3 dose levels SC | SC | Adult female rat | 3 months |
| Andersen et al. 2001 (bone protection) | 100 µg/kg 3×/day | SC | Adult female rat | 3 months |
| Venkova et al. 2009 (GI motility) | 0.01–1 mg/kg | IV | Male rat | Acute / repetitive |
| NCT00672074 (Phase 2 clinical) | Not published | IV | Human (post-surgical) | Trial duration |
Ipamorelin Half-Life and Pharmacokinetics
Plasma half-life: approximately 2 hours in rat and pharmacokinetic model data. GH pulse peak at 15–40 minutes post-injection SC. GH returns to baseline within approximately 3 hours.[2] Each subcutaneous injection produces one clean GH pulse without a persistent plateau — the pulse architecture that underlies the dosing-frequency rationale in research protocols.
Systemic clearance is approximately 5-fold lower than GHRP-6.[2] This reduced clearance — ipamorelin is metabolically more resistant — produces more predictable exposure per injection. Route comparisons from Johansen et al.: subcutaneous bioavailability is the primary route used in bone and body composition studies; intranasal bioavailability is approximately 20%, significantly lower but measurable; intravenous is used in acute GH-pulse and GI motility studies.[2] Excretion is predominantly urinary: 60–80% of administered dose is recoverable intact from urine and bile, distinguishing ipamorelin from GHRP-6 (primarily biliary). Free-acid metabolites persist in urine after the parent compound clears — the basis for the WADA detection window established in Semenistaya et al. 2015.[9]
For Ipamorelin half-life and pharmacokinetics: t₁/₂ ≈ 2 h, Tmax SC 15–40 min, GH-return to baseline ~3 h. These are rodent parameters; human pharmacokinetics have not been formally characterized in published literature.
Ipamorelin Dosing Frequency in Preclinical Protocols
Dosing frequency varies by research objective in the published record. GH-pulse selectivity studies are acute (single IV dose for immediate hormonal panel measurement).[1] Bone elongation studies use subcutaneous administration without a stated frequency in the Johansen 1999 study — continuous or daily dosing is implied by the three-month treatment window.[3] The Andersen 2001 bone protection study explicitly uses three-times-daily SC injection for three months, representing the most intensive preclinical frequency protocol in the record.[4] GI motility studies use either single IV bolus or repetitive IV dosing within a defined post-surgical observation window.[5]
Preclinical data on fasted-state versus fed-state timing interactions with GH pulse magnitude has not been characterized in the ipamorelin literature specifically, though both fasted and fed timing contexts appear across protocols. Optimal timing for GH-pulse maximization varies by model and co-agent — ghrelin receptor sensitivity is circadian-modulated in rodent models, but ipamorelin's short half-life (~2 h) means pulse shape is determined primarily by receptor occupancy kinetics rather than circadian gating.
How long for Ipamorelin to work in animal models depends on the endpoint: GH pulse onset is 15–30 minutes post-injection;[2] bowel motility changes appear within hours in surgical models;[5] bone formation changes are measured over 3-month treatment windows.[4]
Routes of Administration Studied
Three routes appear in the published ipamorelin literature:
Intravenous (IV): Acute pharmacology and GI motility studies.[1][5][6][15] Provides the most controlled PK/PD profile for dose-response characterization. The Phase 2 clinical trial used IV infusion.
Subcutaneous (SC): Bone studies and somatotroph plasticity studies.[3][4][7] Each SC injection produces one discrete GH pulse with peak at 15–40 min and return to baseline at ~3 h.[2] Subcutaneous is the predominant route in the literature for studies measuring longitudinal physiological effects.
Intranasal: Characterized by Johansen et al. for bioavailability; approximately 20% systemic exposure relative to IV.[2] The intranasal route is also the context for the WADA anti-doping metabolite detection study by Semenistaya et al.,[9] which confirmed that nasal administration leaves a urinary metabolite fingerprint distinct from parenteral administration.
Human clinical pharmacokinetics for any of these routes have not been formally published. The Phase 2 trial (NCT00672074) used IV, but no results describing human PK parameters appear in the public record.[15] All half-life and clearance figures above are rodent data.